This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
This article explores AI’s historical evolution, critically assesses its benefits and challenges for teaching, and provides evidence-based strategies for faculty to integrate AI effectively. Grounded in the scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL), it expands on prior work (e.g., 2023; Topol, 2019). Spitale et al.
Research indicates that students thrive both developmentally and academically when educational programs prioritize socially aligned approaches and strategies (Aspelin 2020, 594). Such strategies equip faculty with the tools to effectively respond to students’ needs (Rahimi et al., 6 (August 26, 2020): 58896.
This article explores AI’s historical evolution, critically assesses its benefits and challenges for teaching, and provides evidence-based strategies for faculty to integrate AI effectively. Grounded in the scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL), it expands on prior work (e.g., 2023; Topol, 2019). Spitale et al.
Research indicates that students thrive both developmentally and academically when educational programs prioritize socially aligned approaches and strategies (Aspelin 2020, 594). Such strategies equip faculty with the tools to effectively respond to students’ needs (Rahimi et al., 6 (August 26, 2020): 58896.
ATSU is also creating a Grow Your Own facultydevelopment program that offers a low-to-no-cost education designed to support students interested in academic medicine. Weaving DEI into Professional Development — The Ohio State University College of Veterinary Medicine. The program is expected to launch in spring 2023.
There are some transfer support scholarships. A notable example of Dr. Wang’s work is her book, “On My Own: The Challenge and Promise of Building Equitable STEM Transfer Pathways” (published in 2020 by Harvard Education Press). I'm not denying that.
It is therefore easier to create a system for scholarships or waivers for folks who are marginalized or do not have institutional funding. Let’s not put exclusionary professional development practices back to what they were before March 2020. ” More than 300 participants from five continents joined us.
We’ve also provided emergency housing, financial support for off-campus temporary housing and scholarships for DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals) students,” says Morishita. We have also increased the financial support for those students that will help them access emergency funds, paid internships and more scholarships.
My journey in student affairs assessment began over a decade ago, when, as a graduate student, I received a scholarship to attend the ACPA Assessment Institute. This experience sparked my passion for addressing equity gaps in student access, learning, development, and experiences.
Put more simply, it asks students to discuss what is and isnt helping them learn (Dangel & Lindsey, 2014; Nelms, 2015; Payette & Brown, 2018; Ufland, 2020; Veeck, et al., Indeed, one of the benefits of the MSF is that unhelpful feedback can be filtered out before the instructor sees it (Ufland, 2020). George, Phillis L.
Put more simply, it asks students to discuss what is and isnt helping them learn (Dangel & Lindsey, 2014; Nelms, 2015; Payette & Brown, 2018; Ufland, 2020; Veeck, et al., Indeed, one of the benefits of the MSF is that unhelpful feedback can be filtered out before the instructor sees it (Ufland, 2020). George, Phillis L.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 29,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content