This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Blogs Improve your programreview process with these 4 data tips A Q&A with Dr. Louis Slimak, Associate Provost at West Virginia University In today’s fast-changing environment, programreview is an increasingly critical area of focus and the first step in delivering a portfolio that meets the institution’s goals and students’ needs.
Continuous program improvement : Making sure your institution offers the right mix of academic programs is crucial for staying competitive while achieving your financial priorities. Most academic programreview processes are lengthy and occur once every few years. Visit our Strategic Advisory Services page to learn more.
In fact, they thought it would greatly increase the work involved for such actions with the addition of necessary policy creation, faculty development, software changes, and the faculty and administrative time to take attendance on each and every student for each and every course. Finally, there are academic implications.
They presented these results at the Annual Leadership Retreat over the summer and the disaggregated program-level results were presented to the faculty in fall 2023. They also made website updates and revised the faculty handbook to provide more direction on how to best support students.
Projects addressed topics such as programreview, data strategy, budget models, enrollment growth, and more. Scroll down to read about each of the capstone projects in the fellows’ own words. The blog posts below are written by the participants to showcase their project and early outcomes.
I may not be able to make the staff happy because I need to do this for faculty and students, or whatever the case may be. The institution had to declare financial exigence and engage in severe retrenchment, closing programs, and terminating tenured faculty. The vice presidents have responsibility for their respective areas.
Larson advised that microcredentials should be “digitally discoverable”, so students can “own the learning upon receiving validation of the competency and skill.” It became quite evident that assessing and evaluating microcredentials will require rapid prototyping with inclusive feedback loops from students, faculty and employers.
Case in point Share the data, good and bad, in an open forum like a faculty meeting or training. You might say: In the data dictionary, we defined ‘student’ as, “anyone enrolled in coursework, after census, in the Fall of this year.” Here’s what we learned.
The Ministry of Education (MOE) advises universities to apply for institutional and program accreditation through the National Commission for Academic Accreditation and Assessment (NCAAA), an independent organization that answers directly to the Council of Higher Education. There is a greater emphasis on value education everywhere.
Initial Accreditation Accrediting organizations view institutional accreditation as a holistic peer review process requiring a team effort to compile a written report documenting how the institution meets the accreditor’s standards. Advise and edit the institutional self-study for Candidacy and Initial Accreditation (i.e.,
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 29,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content